In this extreme case, the president, who has the responsibility to ensure the continuity of the state, also has the means to do so, because he may resort to the nation to make it the judge of the dispute via new elections, or a referendum, or both. As for the reluctant coalition partner, it may vote to support the motion while expressing reservations and criticisms. De Gaulle took note of the resignation without formally accepting it, and requested the Government to remain in office, and announced the dissolution of the National Assembly on 9 October. They did this, however, always emphasizing that they proceeded from the president of the Republic and not the parliament, and that it was not an investiture. It sets out the political responsibility of the government the executive power before the parliament legislative power. In addition, it may be used on several successive readings of the same text. It is part of Title V:
The interruption of this practice persisted after the parliamentary dissolution of May even when the governments had found a crushing and disciplined majority in the parliament, showing that the practice is considered as optional some commitments of responsibility did occur, but not immediately after the nomination of the governments. His reading gave the president of the republic a primacy that goes well beyond the letter of the constitution, but which is often consistent with the practice. On the other hand, under the Fifth Republic, it no longer possible, as under the previous Republic or regimes, to attach motions of confidence to votes of law to force the assembly to vote on the combined motion and the law. Lacking a guaranteed majority, it is preferable for the government to wait for a motion of no confidence described in part 2, the adoption of which is more difficult than a simple refusal of confidence. Voting on the motion can assure MPs worried about the unpopularity of their party if there is a clear victory in the National Assembly. If the former can be understood as a catalogue of the principal arrangements that the government hopes to make, probably as soon as it is established, in the logic of the investiture, and the latter as an explanation of its reasoning and of its intentions in a precise domain which would take—or to which the government would want to give—a particular importance, the distinction has no practical consequence.
Chevallier, Carcassonne, Duhamelp This was also the opinion of most experts, by the State Council whose opinion was published in the press after a leak, by the Constitutional Council whose advice remains confidential, and by most of the entourage of the president, even the Prime Minister.
Article 49 of the French Constitution
Various solutions have been implemented to ensure the ability of the government to pass laws. The motion of confidence is the weapon of the government, and it alone. However it was the procedure which was under attack, because De Gaulle choose to revise the constitution with the Article 11 and not with the Article 89 which requires the consent of parliament. When introducing the motion of confidence in the National Assembly, the prime minister generally takes the opportunity to make an important political statement.
The article allows the government to compel the majority if reluctant to adopt a text, and also to accelerate the legislative process, and in particular to end any obstruction from the opposition.
On the other hand, under the Fifth Republic, it no longer possible, as under the previous Republic or regimes, to attach motions of confidence to votes of law to force the assembly to vote on the combined motion and the law.
Then, he stated that he wanted scritin create a precedent establishing the optional character of this commitment.
The Fifth Republic provides for a much more powerful weapon with the paragraph 3 see below. Its meaning is sometimes imprecise, gouvernementalf therefore its interpretation is disputed, particularly concerning the obligatory or optional character of this commitment. However, the impact of the motion is often limited and does not often change the popularity of the government and its majority unless the prime minister delivers a highly successful speech.
In any case, this deliberation does not give the president, especially in a period of “cohabitation”, the power to prevent the commitment of his responsibility, except in the improbable case of a refusal to enter the question on the agenda of the Cabinet.
Pompidou’s new government was appointed after the elections. The interruption of this practice persisted after the parliamentary dissolution of May even when the governments had found a crushing and disciplined majority in the parliament, showing that the practice is considered as optional some commitments of responsibility did occur, but not immediately after the nomination of the governments.
Maurice Couve de Murville. In contrast to article 10 which fixes a period of fifteen days for the promulgation of laws, unanimously considered as an obligation of the president, article 13 does not set a deadline. Lacking a guaranteed majority, it is preferable for the government to wait for a motion of no confidence described in part 2, the adoption of which is more difficult than a simple refusal of confidence.
For example, the Constitution of Scruutin states that “The government has to appear before each chamber no later than ten days after its appointment to get a vote of confidence” The motion was passed easily, the Gaullist party UNR being the only major group not to vote it.
First, sfabilité a vote of non-confidence is approved by the National Assembly, the government, instead of resigning, is likely to ask diseertation president to dissolve the assembly to stop it from voting.
Article 49 of the French Constitution – Wikipedia
The gouvernements have always spoken of authorization or of the agreement of the Cabinet. The Constitutional Council validated the commitment of the responsibility of the government in section 3 by the phrasing “to the extent that the Cabinet had deliberated [ Views Read Edit Dissergation history.
The procedure of section Retrieved from ” https: A vote of no confidence censure is a means for the National Assembly, on its own initiative, to force the government to resign. The Constitutional Law adopted on 21 July amended article 49 of the Constitution. Some time later, he said: Under former practices, the government could link its continuance to the adoption of the stabiilté texts.
In the summer ofthe gouvernemetnale ended, and many of the deputies wished to revert to a more parliamentarian regime. Thus, the motion of confidence is an arm at the disposition of the government alone. Ces deux causes ont disparu.